Clean Cars
A Legislative Brief for the Center for State Innovation
Air pollution from cars and trucks is dangerous to America’s health.
The exhaust from internal combustion engines contains many harmful by-products, including hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and fine airborne particulate matter.
[1]
Hydrocarbons create smog and cause cancer in humans. Carbon monoxide is a poisonous gas that limits the flow of oxygen to the brain and the body. Nitrogen oxides damage lung tissue and cause acid rain. Fine airborne particulate matter causes lung damage and cancer.
[2]
Hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides, and fine airborne particulate matter aggravate respiratory diseases, such as asthma.
Air pollution caused by motor vehicle exhaust is especially harmful to children.
Infants and young children tend to breathe through their mouths, which allows polluted air to bypass filtering mechanisms in the nasal passages. They also breathe more rapidly than adults and spend more time outdoors—especially in the summer, when smog levels are highest. Children’s airways are smaller, which makes airborne particles more damaging. Damage sustained during childhood can severely affect development of the nervous, immune and respiratory systems, and can increase the risk of developing cancer and other diseases later in life.
[3]
Children in urban areas are disproportionately affected by air pollution.
A Harvard University study conducted with the American Public Health Association (APHA) showed that low-income and minority groups in the inner cities experience significantly higher rates of harm than other groups. The highest incidence of asthma in children is found among low-income and African American toddlers, who predominantly live in urban areas. Researchers in the Harvard/APHA study point out that global warming caused by increased emissions also causes pollen seasons to arrive earlier, which further contributes to poor respiratory health among vulnerable populations.
[4]
Pollutants from cars and trucks contribute to global warming.
Carbon dioxide produced by vehicles accounts for 26 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. Our nation’s transportation sector alone emits more carbon dioxide than any entire country except China, which has four times the U.S. population.
[5]
Greenhouse gases absorb sunlight that reflects off the Earth’s surface to create a blanket of heated gas in the atmosphere. A rapid increase in greenhouse gases has caused climate change around the world, including global warming, changed weather patterns, and more cases of severe weather.
[6]
Most states can choose to adopt stricter vehicle emissions standards.
All new vehicles for sale in the U.S. must meet federal emissions standards set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The EPA standards limit the amount of hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and fine airborne particulate matter that can come from a vehicle’s tailpipe and leak from its fuel system. Vehicles sold in California, Massachusetts and New York must meet the stringent emissions standards established by the California Air Resources Board. The California standards promote the sale of zero-emission vehicles—typically electric cars—as well as low-emission hybrids. The Board has voted to strengthen its emissions standards for the 2009 model year, although the auto industry is challenging the new regulations. Federal law prohibits states from setting their own independent emissions standards, but they can adopt the California standards if pollution levels in any county in the state exceed any of the EPA’s National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Thirty-three states (AL, AZ, CO, CT, DE, GA, ID, IL, IN, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MN, MO, MT, NV, NH, NJ, NM, NY, OH, OR, PA, RI, TX, UT, VT, VA, WA, WI, WY) and the District of Columbia are eligible to adopt California’s standards using the NAAQS measure.
[7]
States have adopted the California standards by both legislation and regulation.
In 2005, Washington adopted California’s emissions standards through legislation and Oregon adopted them by executive order. Altogether, sixteen states (AZ, CA, CO, CT, FL, MA, MD, ME, NJ, NY, NM, OR, RI, UT, VT, WA) have adopted or are in the process of adopting California’s tailpipe emission standards.
[8] . Standards in some states have not yet taken effect.
This policy brief relies in large part on information from the State Environmental Resource Center, a project of Defenders of Wildlife.
Model Legislation
Low Emission Vehicle Act
Summary: The Low Emission Vehicle Act adopts the California vehicle emission rules (commonly known as LEV II), which set a stricter standard than the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s National Low Emission Vehicle (NLEV) standard.
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE
This Act shall be called the “Low Emission Vehicle Act.”
SECTION 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE
(A) FINDINGS—
The legislature finds that:
1. Air pollution from cars and trucks is dangerous to the health of [State] residents.
2. Motor vehicles are a major source of pollution in [State], and contribute to greenhouse gases that cause worldwide climate change.
3. Technology can significantly reduce dangerous emissions from motor vehicles.
(B) PURPOSE—
This law is enacted to protect the health and safety of [State] residents.
SECTION 3. LOW EMISSION VEHICLES
After section XXX, the following new section XXX shall be inserted:
(A) The Department of [Environmental Protection] shall implement Phase II of the California Low Emission Vehicle program in this State beginning in the 2009 automobile model year. “Phase II of the California Low Emission Vehicle program” means the second phase of the low emission vehicle program implemented in California, pursuant to the requirements of the federal Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 7401 et seq.
(B) The Department of [Environmental Protection] shall promulgate such regulations as are necessary to implement this section.
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Act shall take effect on July 1, 2006.
[1] California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment and the American Lung Association of California, “Fuels and Your Health,” 2003.
[2] Clean Car Campaign, “Emissions,” 2004.
[3] California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment and the American Lung Association of California, “Air Pollution and Children’s Health,” 2003.
[4] Paul R. Epstein and Christine Rogers, “Inside the Greenhouse: The Impacts of CO2 and Climate Change on Public Health in the Inner City,” Center for Health and the Global Environment, Harvard Medical School, April 2004.
[5] Pew Center on Global Climate Change, “Analysis of the Feasibility of Greenhouse Gas Reporting,” September 2002.
[6] American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, “Automobiles and the Environment,” 2003.
[7] State Environmental Resource Center, “California’s Motor Vehicle Emissions Program: Should Your State Adopt It?” 2003.
[8] Pew Center on Global Climate Change. “Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards.” Retrieved November 6, 2008 from, http://www.pewclimate.org/what_s_being_done/in_the_states/vehicle_ghg_standard.cfm.